Hans de Goede wrote:
Don't get me wrong I think that people who contribute to Fedora by doing
marketing in the broadest sense of the word, or by doing translations,
as such have earned every right to influence future development of
Fedora. But how is it that the people who are building the distro, do
not get to influence how the distro is represented to the world by our
Ambassadors?
I am not an Ambassador so I can't vote there but I don't have any
problem with that, from the mission and goals, it seems like it is an
administrative organization and it make sense for the vote to be closed
to its members:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/SteeringCommittee#Mission_and_Goals
Also, the Ambassadors are an easy to join group, I believe a number of
developers are registered as Ambassadors.
--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
