Re: rawhide report: 20081128 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:34 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> Isn't it redundant for the rawhide report to show more than one broken
> package dependency anyway?  Certainly if the deps that are broken come
> from the same package ...

Each broken dep may be from a different cause, and fixing one won't
necessarily fix the other.

Basically FESCo has noticed that the broken deps have dragged on a few
days, and wanted to offer a hand in fixing them up.  That's kind of part
of FESCo's responsibility, to help out where help is needed.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux