On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > It's more about not flooding the rawhide reports with a sea of OCaml > broken dep emails. That decreases readability for others looking for > things they can fix. (Aside from the primary concern of just wanting > to get OCaml fixed too.) Isn't it redundant for the rawhide report to show more than one broken package dependency anyway? Certainly if the deps that are broken come from the same package ... Anyway, I'm rebuilding some now. Rich. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
