Darryl L. Pierce (dpierce@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:43:14AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:30 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > > Shouldn't installing X make runlevel 5 the default? > > > > No. > > That's fine. I wasn't sure how it ought to proceed. If you install a desktop, anaconda will modify the default runlevel. (This may be limited to GNOME or KDE.) Otherwise, we don't touch it. > > > And, even if we don't install X, why should't services toggle their > > > runlevel 5 state? > > > > This seems to be the interesting part. This... shouldn't happen. > > Agreed. I wasn't sure which component owned the services > configuration, so thought I'd float this here before logging a BZ > ticket. Nothing should specifically change for runlevel 5 from the defaults. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
