On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:43:14AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:30 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > Shouldn't installing X make runlevel 5 the default? > > No. That's fine. I wasn't sure how it ought to proceed. > > And, even if we don't install X, why should't services toggle their > > runlevel 5 state? > > This seems to be the interesting part. This... shouldn't happen. Agreed. I wasn't sure which component owned the services configuration, so thought I'd float this here before logging a BZ ticket. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. - http://www.redhat.com/ oVirt - Virtual Machine Management - http://www.ovirt.org/ "What do you care what other people think, Mr. Feynman?"
Attachment:
pgpCDxeUHYozU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
