Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 01 December 2008 07:33:08 pm Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Jens Petersen wrote:
> > ----- "Kevin Kofler" <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> * start discouraging shipping pregenerated files, instead make sure that
> >> autoreconf actually works (which mainly amounts to the above point about
> >> backwards compatibility).
> >> But unfortunately, this won't solve the problem of the reliance on the
> >> shell, and as configure.ac scripts can contain arbitrary shell snippets,
> >> this can't really be fixed without a major redesign, the result of which
> >> would effectively no longer be autotools.
> >
> > I would add:
> >
> > * do not start new projects using autotools as far as possible
>
> Maybe you can offer an alternative?  And no, I don't mean reciting names of
> some hacks some cool kids may have put together for their birthday...  And
> not something that requires me to install it first before I can build this
> tarball I downloaded.
>
> behdad

In other words, you'll accept nothing less than an autotools clone, or 
autotools itself?

-- 
Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux