Re: Fedora Release Engineering Meeting Recap 2008-12-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chuck Anderson (cra@xxxxxxx) said: 
> Does the "is-a" relationship between F10 and F11 have to be the 
> already-chosen "original code name of Red Hat Linux", or are we 
> allowed to come up with a new "is-a" relationship between Cambridge 
> and the F11 name?

No. The connection used to get from Sulphur to Cambridge was a
city, so that's the 'is-a' that's out of bounds.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux