On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 06:52:30PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 10:35 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > Hi, Everyone: > > > > Kernel upstream again had some build issues related to the "nousb" > > parameter (it's being switched to core_param() API now). This got me > > wondering if it's still useful now that we have kernels unified for > > installation and normal work. It was introduced initially to work > > around the issues with the crippled i386 kernel. So, the question: > > does anyone still use "nousb"? If yes, please let me know. > Yes, I am. And me - on boxes with buggy BIOS SMM. > > I can just fix something in ACPI table parsing for you. My goal is > > to drop "nousb" in Fedora 11. > > <sigh/> another nail in Fedora's coffin on low end platforms? And some high end ones where you need a BIOS upgrade and it isn't ACPI failures. My low end ones are all fine with USB ;) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
