On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 10:35 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Hi, Everyone: > > Kernel upstream again had some build issues related to the "nousb" > parameter (it's being switched to core_param() API now). This got me > wondering if it's still useful now that we have kernels unified for > installation and normal work. It was introduced initially to work > around the issues with the crippled i386 kernel. So, the question: > does anyone still use "nousb"? If yes, please let me know. Yes, I am. Typically on older machines, * which don't have USB. * on which USB is too uneffective to be useful (e.g. only have USB-1.x) * on which USB is not supposed to be used. > Maybe > I can just fix something in ACPI table parsing for you. My goal is > to drop "nousb" in Fedora 11. <sigh/> another nail in Fedora's coffin on low end platforms? Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
