Re: What do we need from Bugzilla? (was: My roadmap for a better Fedora)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Emmanuel Seyman
<emmanuel.seyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Les Mikesell [21/11/2008 15:16] :
>>
>> If someone does this right, maybe it would be possible to cascade all
>> the way up from user/site/enterprise instances and a working version
>
> It could be done. This is why so much work has been done on the XML-RPC
> workings for Bugzilla 3.2.
>
>> included in the distribution would have templates for all the packages
>> and a checkbox for whether or not to push a specific entry upstream or
>> not.
>
> Deciding to push a bug upstream or not cannot be reduced to checking a
> box or pushing a button. You need to search the upstream bug tracker
> before submitting and link your bug to an already existing bug in
> upstream if it already exists, fill in new fields and make sure that
> the fields that are dropped don't make the bug incomprehensible.
>
> Emmanuel


Wait, there is already an XML-RPC extension? My (possible) time may be
better spent building a UI then?

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux