Re: What do we need from Bugzilla? (was: My roadmap for a better Fedora)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Matej Cepl [21/11/2008 12:15] :
>
> No, they shouldn't and they shouldn't need to. We cannot force 
> our reporters to crete accounts in the upstream bugzillas. We 
> should deliver comments from the upstream bugzilla to our one 
> (via XML-RPC I guess).

This has the inconvenience that :

a) Two (or more) conversations are taking place in the bug report.
b) Comments like "the fix proposed in comment #7 looks good" lose
   all meaning, unless you know what comments come from which bug
   tracker.

I suppose we can live with it, though.

> the upstream bugzilla in other tab. However, I have to admit that 
> after brief query in the upstream database (e.g., in mozilla with 
> the query tool in the new bug page) I just dump the bug there and 
> let upstream triagers show that they know much better what's in 
> their bugzilla.

Thanks for making their work more difficult, I guess.

Emmanuel

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux