Re: Removing "minimal buildroot" dependencies from rpmdevtools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 20 November 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> If the other depsolvers don't handle comps, they're rather useless in
> the Fedora world, 

I don't think support for any kind of special grouping is a prerequisite for a 
depsolver to be useful.  I don't remember ever missing that feature when I 
used apt/smart, and now that I've been using mostly yum for a while, I don't 
remember ever invoking any of its group* commands.  Plain old metapackages 
have worked well for me in the (quite rare) cases where I've needed something 
like that.  comps/yum grouping have their own valid purposes for different 
use cases, but saying a depsolver without support for that is rather useless 
is in my opinion more than a little extreme.

> where are grouping is done exclusively via comps.

Not really - we also have metapackages for grouping and new ones do get 
introduced every now and then.  See for example git-all, perl-core, R.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux