On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Utterly useless. I already have a HUGE number of bug reports. The problem > is that 90% of them are essentially useless when first reported. It requires > several back/forth interactions between myself & the bug reporter to get > enough information to diagnose & resolve the problem. If we create a system > where we bombard maintainers with bugreports & no scope for user interaction > they'll end up directly in /dev/null, and further discourage maintainers > from addressing even bugs with enough info. Is the upstream automated kerneloops stuff a counter example methodology? Or does that only work because they get sooooooo many more crash reports that the statistics become a useful way to sort? -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
