On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:23:42AM +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2008/11/19, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > Because it's not a one-way communication (at least, not if you want it > > to be effective.) > > I think you misundestood something. If order to effectively hunt > issues, we definitely need HUGE number of bugreports (remember > Necrosoft's "Send crash dump" utility). That definitely means one-way > communication. I'm insisting - one-way communication (e.g. user will > send bugreport to invisible-to-him blackhole, w/o answer, with some > handy tool). Utterly useless. I already have a HUGE number of bug reports. The problem is that 90% of them are essentially useless when first reported. It requires several back/forth interactions between myself & the bug reporter to get enough information to diagnose & resolve the problem. If we create a system where we bombard maintainers with bugreports & no scope for user interaction they'll end up directly in /dev/null, and further discourage maintainers from addressing even bugs with enough info. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
