Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is the one drawback to this strategy. Here a human judgement call would
have to be made: Take the package and all its deps or run the risk. The
right answer would depend on the case, and on what the stable group decides
their use case is best served by.
Security updates break the model for testing to. This is a known problem space.
If you take your idea...but also make it so client side users can
specifically know what is tagged as security and what is
not...regardless of repo "speed" then you probably have something
robust enough for everyone.
Give client side the option to pull ALL security updates...from any
repo "speed." That way the "slow" update repo doesn't have to be
burdened with dealing with security updates as part of their mission
as a special case.
-jef
Not a bad idea.
--CJD
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
