-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Casey Dahlin schrieb: > There's been a lot of talk about a stable release lately. Most agree > that its not what Fedora does best and not something that would be > natural for us to do. I have a sort of middle-ground proposal that > might be easy enough to implement that we could try it out. I see the following issue: If a maintainer publish a security update, which depends of one of the package which are in the 'slow updates' repository, how do you want to handle this case? Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkjECgACgkQT2AHK6txfgylDwCgugxmoct+pW6KQA002R2Hpt2q Y/sAoMlMYSAreaaw4X6NLtTJXIDc2Woj =AdjS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
