David Nielsen <gnomeuser <at> gmail.com> writes: > And if it's deemed stable enough for F10 as a release then surely it should be stable enough as an update for F9. A big and not uncomplicated update granted but we could in theory put this into updates-testing and roll it out for F9 as well. If the argument against doing this would be stability one would be left questioning how F10 could be labelled stable in the fist place. An oversimplification, IMHO. Just because all that was stable with the rest of the stuff shipped with F-10, doesn't mean the effect will be the same when it lands next to the rest of the stuff from F-9. It needs to be compiled (with a different compiler and libs?), packaged (against different dependencies?) and tested _again_ (in how many combinations?). It is just too much work for not good reason whatsoever. -- Bojan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
