up2date, system-config-packages and synaptic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My question here is why is the fedora team wasting so
much time developing up2date and
system-config-packages when synaptic is already an
excellent replacement. Even though it uses apt, worst
case would be to get the latest source and code in
support for yum then. I have had nothing but problems
with up2date. I have had packages fail to install and
yet appear to be installed as far as up2date is
concerned, system-config-packages though its getting
better still has a ways to go before it has the
features that synaptic has. If the developers choose
to continue to use up2date and system-config-packages,
I will continue to use the products during the rest of
the test phase but when Fedora Core 2 is released I
plan on switching to synaptic. Synaptic is full of
features, stable and fast. I look foward to seeing
what everyone has to say on this subject.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux