Re: With udev, are dev and MAKEDEV still required?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:57:55AM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> A problem with MAKEDEV is, that it places the MAKEDEV *binary* into
> /dev. This is a really bad place for it; devfs under 2.4 removed it and
> buildsystems which need a special /dev will remove it also.

Unix tradition is the essential reason for this. Nothing more.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux