On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:42:23PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:01:21AM -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > > > >Yeah. There are lots of strange things to be found in userland. Like > > >openssl assuming that linux-elf == i386, for example. > > > > > >OK, so how do I go from here? Should I just submit all my patches to > > >bugzilla and wait? > > > > - File against each component in product "Fedora Core". > > OK, my binutils patch just got rejected because "Fedora Core 2 isn't > ported to the ARM." If you have FC2 based port, please keep the patch local to the ARM port (say have binutils-2.15.90.0.3-5xscale.src.rpm instead of what was shipped in FC2 - e.g. Fedora Core SPARC port does the same). I don't think it is a good idea to issue FC2 updates just because there was an ARM patch added, FC2 users on i386/x86-64 would IMHO definitely not appreciate having to download the updates with zero changes. binutils in FC3 will be 2.15.91.0.2 (~end of July '04) or later, so the patch in question is definitely there for FC3. Jakub
