Re: Fedora Extras vs. CLOSED RAWHIDE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:54:12PM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:52:37AM -0700, Steve G wrote:
> 
> > For example, /sbin/grub-install. The grub package states bash &
> > texinfo. I get coreutils, diffutils, grep, and sed just for that one
> > file! It would be nice if rpmbuild scanned for shell scripts,
> > capture the info, resolve the files to a package, and add the
> > packages to the runtime requirements. Its really simple.
> > http://www.web-insights.net/sh2rpms if you want the bash script.
> 
> We patch our bash package to have an --rpm-requires option to provide
> just this functionality (but it isn't used).

Nice, I didn't know this was there.  What would the implications of running
this as a per interpreter find-requires at build time on shell scripts?

Paul


> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux