On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Richard Hally wrote: > John Hearns wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 09:08, Richard Hally wrote: > > > > > >>They claim (by the nature of the URL) that it is FEDORA REDHAT. Aren't > >>you concerned that someone may be misrepresenting that that it is REDHAT? > > > > After all, it is a mirror of http://fedora.redhat.com > > > > > The previous poster implied that "it could be anything". I'd like to > hear from someone at redhat whether it is really redhat or not. If it is > a fake mirror, don't you think redhat would be concerned? If it is a > good mirror why would Bill Notingham say Tuesday when it is already out? Because the official release is not until tomorrow. If they are GPG signed by Red Hat then most likely they are real and this is just a screw up on the part of one of the mirror operators. It is not the first time and it will not be the last. HTH, Tom
