On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 01:29, Richard Hally wrote: > The previous poster implied that "it could be anything". I'd like to > hear from someone at redhat whether it is really redhat or not. If it is > a fake mirror, don't you think redhat would be concerned? If it is a > good mirror why would Bill Notingham say Tuesday when it is already out? I only implied it could be anything if you haven't verified the md5sum against official. If it is genuine (as I suspect) then it's probably a mis-configured mirror that allows read access before it should. But me - I get the MD5SUM from the official fedora server - and then the ISO's from whatever fast mirror is close. Since I can't currently get the MD5SUM from the Fedora official server - I don't trust the content of that mirror. It could be anything. -- Cheap Linux CD's - http://mpeters.us/linux/
