On Fri, Apr 23, 2004, Tom Diehl <tdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Chuck Mead wrote: > > > Florin Andrei wrote: > > | Is i too late to include Postfix-2.1 in FC2? > > | That "inspect mail before it is queued" thing looks really nice. ;-) > > | > > > > Is anyone working on an rpm for this that includes TLS? Though I suppose > > we could always wait for Simon Mudd to finish his. > > Simon is working on it although it would appear he is having some problems > getting the srpm into a state where it will build on all of the supported > platforms. Currently I cannot get it to build on RHEL3 and I know of st least > 2 other people having the same problem. 1 is on whitebox and the other I do > not know what platform/distro he is using. I really feel this is just a > variable not getting set properly as Simon has indicated it builds on > whitebox for him. I expect to see an announcment/request for testing from > him soon. IIRC the postfix-RC test rpms had TLS included. I grabbed his latest 2.1-RC4 RPM packages and adapted it to FC1 and the release 2.1pl0. The big problem getting it to compile was with embedded %doc and %install strings that silently caused rpmbuild to fail with a strange error message. Deleting the % sign from the comments fixed the problem. It appears that there are some patches included that are only appropriate for 2.0 and not 2.1. Atleast they give a ton of patching errors if you try to use them. The TLS patches are one of them. I finally did get a package built and I'm playing around with it now, but the lack of TLS is a problem for me right now. I was going to spend some more time this weekend figuring out what needs to be done to get Postfix 2.1 with TLS support. (I haven't been keeping up) JE
