On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 15:11:49 PM +0300, Razvan Corneliu C.R. d3vi1 VILT (razvan.vilt@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Please no, keep them separated. In addition to the reason you mention, > > saving space on disk is never a bad idea. > > > He meant Source RPM as in .src.rpm or .srpm > Just like for other packages the binaries can be split. kernel is also > only one __SOURCE__ package but multiple binaries > (i386/i586/i686/docs/source) > > Haveing a single source package is a better sollution because you can > have a consistent way of patching things, and only one spec file. > > My vote goes for "1 source package" and "1 binary package for each > language". Agreed 100%. I was referring only to .rpm for end users interested in only one language. Ciao, Marco Fioretti -- Marco Fioretti m.fioretti, at the server inwind.it Red Hat for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/en/ Preserve the old, but know the new.
