On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 11:30 +0200, M. Fioretti wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 11:00:48 AM +1000, Phil Anderson (phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > Do you think I should use one big source RPM for all the languages? > > Please no, keep them separated. In addition to the reason you mention, > saving space on disk is never a bad idea. > He meant Source RPM as in .src.rpm or .srpm Just like for other packages the binaries can be split. kernel is also only one __SOURCE__ package but multiple binaries (i386/i586/i686/docs/source) Haveing a single source package is a better sollution because you can have a consistent way of patching things, and only one spec file. My vote goes for "1 source package" and "1 binary package for each language".
