That's now done :D !
I ofc don't expect the gnome-sig to be actively maintaining blueprint.
But, it's good for it to have access in case something needs to be
urgently fixed since it's part of the GNOME wider ecosystem.
Le 13/09/2022 à 23:08, Kalev Lember a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:04 PM Lyes Saadi <lyessaadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:lyessaadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hello,
I'm maintaining the blueprint-compiler package for Fedora. I figured
out
that the gnome-sig would probably be interested in maintaining this
package as well. So, should I give the gnome-sig admin/commit rights
over rpms/blueprint-compiler?
Hi Lyes,
Thanks for asking! Yes, I think it would make sense for gnome-sig to
have access to it as it's a module from gnome github. I won't promise
that we are going to keep it updated together with all the rest of the
GNOME packages, but it's good to have commit access just in case.
Thanks,
Kalev
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
