Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...

> But it'd be nice to have tooling (both upstream and in Fedora) to help
> extension developers and maintainers.

The workstation working group discussed this yesterday, and agreed
that it would be good to have a dependency generator for packaged
gnome-shell extensions. We have a tracking issue for this, here:

https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/257

If anyone would like to help implement this, we'd love your input!

Allan
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux