On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 14:51 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 12:18 PM Adam Williamson > <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 13:49 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > How confident are we that if they'd picked guided partitioning, it would > > > have Just Worked? I am happy to gently say "you're getting a more > > > complicated experience because you picked the option labeled 'advanced > > > custom'", but I don't want to do that if the guided option won't work for > > > some reason. > > > > In that particular case, file under "not very", because it seems odd > > that what the user describes themselves as doing didn't work. As > > described it *should* have worked. > > They didn't describe the Advanced-Custom layout at all. I get no > indication they chose the existing ESP or creating a new one, and > assigning it to /boot/efi. Based on the error message, I'm supremely > confident they didn't do that. And that automatic/guided path would > have worked. Oh, I think I misread a bit. I was reading the quoted text in https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/problems-making-dual-boot-fedora-w10/10766/3 as part of the reporter's description, but I think it may be quoted from the article mattdm linked to and the OP is just saying they don't find it to be enough information. If so, then yeah, we don't really have any info about what they tried to do and it's most likely that they did it wrong, and that guided partitioning would've worked fine. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
