On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:01 PM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:13 am, Adam Williamson > > <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So, once again: do we think it makes sense to consider desktop user > > > switching - that is, switching between multiple active desktop > > > sessions > > > for different users, without logging out and in - as release-blocking? > > > > Workstation WG agrees that user switching should be release blocking. > > We trust QA will write the specific release criterion. > > Obvious thing to do would be to resurrect kparal's old draft. So, KDE > team, since we'll be blocking on this for GNOME, do you want us to > include KDE too or make it Workstation-only? Thanks! I believe Rex mentioned earlier in the thread[1] that it should include KDE. As a member of both Workstation WG and KDE SIG, I support this. [1]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/6HEJM5VPIAQOZ4YYWUOXNBLD3OR27B3Y/ -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
