On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:38 AM Michal Konecny <mkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2019-10-30 18:40, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:37 PM Michal Konecny <mkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2019-10-30 11:29, Chris Murphy wrote: > >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:33 AM Michal Konecny <mkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> I recently hit something similar on Silverblue. I installed Silverblue when F28 was available and installing flatpaks without the --user flag. > >>> I'm pretty sure the default is --user since before Fedora 28. Very > >>> early on the default was --system. > >> This is strange, I installed most of my flatpaks through GNOME Software > >> and all of them are in > >> /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-workstation/var/lib/flatpak, which I > >> suppose looks like --system flag. > > OK, lovely, so I'm confused. On my cleanly installed Fedora 31 > > Workstation system, I'm seeing what you're seeing. Flatpaks installed > > via GNOME Software are in /var/lib/flatpak which is consistent with > > flatpak --system installation. > > > > So it would seem, GNOME Software defaults to --system, whereas the > > flatpak CLI defaults to --user. > > > >> Honestly, I'm not sure, it was few years ago. It is possible that I did > >> some manual partitioning. > > You can post /etc/fstab or show the output from df and it should be > > enough info to figure out what the layout is. > Here is my output from df -h: > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > devtmpfs 3.8G 0 3.8G 0% /dev > tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev/shm > tmpfs 3.9G 2.1M 3.9G 1% /run > /dev/mapper/fedora-root 49G 42G 4.8G 90% /sysroot > tmpfs 3.9G 28K 3.9G 1% /tmp > /dev/nvme0n1p2 976M 140M 770M 16% /boot > /dev/nvme0n1p1 200M 7.9M 192M 4% /boot/efi > /dev/mapper/fedora-home 176G 79G 88G 48% /var/home > tmpfs 784M 224K 784M 1% /run/user/1000 OK I think I understand. I was thinking of some older Atomic edition threads and behaviors, and just assumed Silverblue had the same layout. But it looks like it has some sort of hybrid between Workstation and Atomic, ergo there's a third variant for Silverblue. https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ostree-list/2015-July/msg00012.html https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2016-September/msg00049.html Maybe consider changing it once we have a better idea whether Silverblue will be rebased on Fedora CoreOS? -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
