----- Original Message ----- > So, do I understand correctly that if you install Totem from Flatpak, there > will be no thumbnails in Nautilus? For thumbnails, you need codecs installed > locally in the system? That would be another argument for improving the > local codecs installation procedure/guide, instead of trying to rely on > Flatpaks (which only solve part of the story). This is a packaging bug, nautilus (packaged as an RPM) should depend on the thumbnailers for the formats it wants to show thumbnails for. For example, out-of-the-box, there's no thumbnailers for epubs but there's one for comic books and PDFs. > I don't understand why you paint it as the only two available options. The > first one is an improvement, yes. The second one is a decline (at least in > my eyes). We can still keep the current state (not ideal, but still better > than the second option). Or perhaps do something else (like the virtual > package in rpmfusion which can be easily installed and provide good guides > in many places, improve messaging in totem when a codec is not found, etc). Those are the only 2 options if we want to make things better. Your example of something else would still require fixing the automatic codecs installation flow. _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx