Re: Release criteria proposal: installing / removing software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 19:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 03:47:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > There's a footnote explaining that already:
> 
> Ah, that clears it up. Thanks :)
> 
> > as explained there, we actually *specifically* added this wording
> > because there was a bug with packages from modules being selected as
> > updates when the modules they were from weren't installed, and we felt 
> > it was best to have the criterion explicitly cover this kind of
> > situation.
> 
> Hmmm; this *could* apply to install, too -- for example, installing a
> package from a module that's not supposed to be enabled, or failing to
> from one that is.

Hum, that's a decent point. /me continues to cogitate
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/XPHXFWSUBHOLZVZWGG64I47HAMPV256E/




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux