On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 19:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 03:47:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > There's a footnote explaining that already: > > Ah, that clears it up. Thanks :) > > > as explained there, we actually *specifically* added this wording > > because there was a bug with packages from modules being selected as > > updates when the modules they were from weren't installed, and we felt > > it was best to have the criterion explicitly cover this kind of > > situation. > > Hmmm; this *could* apply to install, too -- for example, installing a > package from a module that's not supposed to be enabled, or failing to > from one that is. Hum, that's a decent point. /me continues to cogitate -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/XPHXFWSUBHOLZVZWGG64I47HAMPV256E/
