Re: Atomic Workstation SIG Project Page

[Owen Taylor <otaylor@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Dusty Mabe <dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 02/22/2018 12:58 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> As agreed in the first Atomic Workstation SIG meeting, I created a Pagure project:
>
>  https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic-workstation
>
> to serve as a place to track issues with the operation of the Atomic Workstation composes, and meeting agenda items for the SIG.

In the interest of trying to make things less confusing I suggest the name of this repo be something different.

- - We have pagure/atomic-wg which is for the atomic (host) working group.
- - We have pagure/fedora-atomic which is for definitions of what goes into FAH
- - We have pagure/workstation-ostree-config: defs for what goes into FAW
- - We have pagure/atomic-ws: deprecated version of workstation-ostree-config
- - We *now* have pagure/fedora-atomic-workstation, which is arguably where pagure/workstation-ostree-config should be
- - We also have the *group* pagure/atomic/* so we can nest things under /atomic/
    - for example we could create pagure/atomic/workstation-sig

And  pagure/fedora-workstation - which is for the Workstation working group. (And a group pagure/fedora-workstation)

 

My strong suggestion is that we have *sig* somewhere in the name of the repo.
My other suggestion is that we try to figure out a better structure for these
repos (maybe nesting more of them under pagure/atomic/)

Thoughts?

I certainly agree the proliferation of inconsistently named repositories is confusing. I talked about naming with Matthias, and we though that a just-spell-it-out approach seemed least likely to run into mental confusion...

 * Is it atomic/workstation or fedora-workstation/atomic?

 * Is it atomic-workstation or atomic-ws

But why no -sig if the idea is to be maximally spelled out? Well, partly I didn't think of it, because i was following the model of fedora-workstation, which is not workstation-wg. But also, the idea of this project is that it's issue tracking not just for the SIG, but for Fedora Atomic Workstation as a composition and running system - this allows us to easily promote things to agenda items by adding a "meeting" tag.

There doesn't seem to be any obvious renaming facilities in Pagure, but we could perhaps get things moved by the admins if we figure out a good structure. Or at least a _better_ structure - if  fedora-workstation, atomic-wg, fedora-atomic are fixed points, we're not going to get to consistency.

Ideas:

 * We could delete my new fedora-atomic-workstation and move workstation-ostree-config  to that name and use that as the issue tracking for the system and sig?

 * Maybe atomic-ws could be moved to old-atomic-ws or something like that to make it a little less obtrusive

Do people have better ideas to try to get to something more globally consistent?

Thanks,

Owen

Dusty


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=VajD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx