Re: Some performance criticisms of F25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 10:26:01AM -0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
> The scheduler choice could be set by a simple udev rule
> 
> $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/60-ssd-scheduler.rules 
> # set deadline scheduler for non-rotating disks
> ACTION=="add|change", KERNEL=="sd[a-z]", ATTR{queue/rotational}=="0", ATTR{queue/scheduler}="deadline"
> 
> 
> $ for f in /sys/block/sd?/queue/rotational; do printf "$f is "; cat $f; done
> /sys/block/sda/queue/rotational is 0
> /sys/block/sdb/queue/rotational is 1
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/rotational is 0
> 
> $ for f in /sys/block/sd?/queue/scheduler; do printf "$f is "; cat $f; done
> /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler is noop [deadline] cfq 
> /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler is noop deadline [cfq] 
> /sys/block/sdc/queue/scheduler is noop [deadline] cfq

This would be F27 material. What about the two new fancy schedulers
added in 4.12 (BFQ, Kyber, https://lwn.net/Articles/720675/)?

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux