Re: Default wallpapers splitted into *-extras

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





El 24/6/2017 1:05 p. m., "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 08:11:47AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 22:58 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > But I think both make sense: we generally *do* want the -extra
> > backgrounds
> > to be installed, they add value to the default installation.
>
> No. The whole point of creating the subpackage was to not have them
> installed by default.

I get why you might want to *allow* to not have them installed at all,
but why not *recommend* that they are installed? On a desktop, the space savings
are insignificant, the wallpapers are pretty, and if somebody doesn't like or
gets tired of the default wallpaper, it's much easier to click-and-select rather
then having to know about the -extras package and installing it and waiting and
*then* click-and-select'ing. And unless you open the background-change dialogue,
a few extra .png files are even hard to notice.


+1 as user I do not want that after a update this wallpapers are not going to be available, even more if I am using some of then
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux