If I would be in the place of decision (but I don't), I would choose the way of "apps" - that we all know, after many mobile solutions. If we are able to catch with some of this process of like these, we'll achieve amazing mobility, and flexibility that includes atomic too. But IMHO I think as a user the question is very good: witch path we take? We have to still use RPM in future? Do we get one click install/remove apps, and app repository, or a mixed bag? Where will appear the gnome extensions? In packages, or in somekind of framework? 2017-06-07 13:06 GMT+02:00 Christian Stadelmann <genodeftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi all, > > I've been using flatpak packages for a while and like the idea of bwrap pretty much, mainly because it improves privilege separation and management. I'm not 100% convinced on flatpak, but it keeps improving. Anyway I think both projects have completely separate (though compatible) goals and might need to be handled separately. Now I am curious: > > 1. Do you plan on sandboxing GUI applications shipped through rpm/dnf? If yes, is there a timeline? Are regressions (sandboxed app vs. same app without sandbox) considered bugs, and if yes, where should I file bug reports? > > 2. Do you plan replacing the GNOME packages shipped through rpm/dnf by packages shipped through flatpak? Or is this an option for the far future? Or do you want to keep shipping two separate ways of installing GUI applications? > _______________________________________________ > desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- PGP: 06853DF7 _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
