Re: User's Feedback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> Problem is: most security updates are not high-priority. We do need 
> daily notification for the most serious security updates, but the vast 
> majority of security updates do not require expedited release. Our 
> updates already have metadata to indicate the severity of the security 
> issue (low/medium/high), so we should start notifying daily only for 
> the high priority security updates and see how well that goes.

Are you sure about that? in my opinion, any security update is high priority.

> Well that's the result of turning off the version checks. There's no 
> way to avoid this without removing support for extensions entirely, or 
> requiring extension authors to validate compatibility. We decided to 
> get rid of that step, so more crashes are to be expected.

No. Version checks are not related to the gnome-shell crashes. The gnome-shell architecture is the cause. Having erratic gnome-shell extensions in a compositor is risky. Having a JavaScript engine in a compositor is risky. Missing debugging features for broken gnome-shell extensions make it very hard to hunt down these bugs. Since the version check was removed, I didn't get more crashes than before.

See also: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367666
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401217
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334226
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704388
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776940
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699610
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691529

> What we should probably do is have a mechanism for flagging extensions 
> as broken, so that they can be removed from extensions.gnome.org until 
> they are fixed.

More importantly, we need a way to hunt down these bugs. Right now I don't see one.

> We must close all GNOME packages to bug reports. GNOME problems just 
> have to be reported upstream. We can't handle the volume on Red Hat 
> Bugzilla, which half the relevant maintainers do not check.

Do I read this correctly as *please report all non-packaging bugs upstream* correctly?

> We also need to do some major, major work on ABRT client-side, maybe 
> even rewrite the client side app from scratch.

+1 for the gui, see https://github.com/abrt/gnome-abrt/issues/49
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux