On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 21:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I *think* comps entries with no explicit 'type' default to being > treated as 'default', not 'mandatory', and dnf is considering it to > be > OK if a 'default' group package cannot be installed. After looking at > the references, I'm pretty sure this is not how yum behaved. I don't > know offhand why this behaviour was changed in dnf. Then we'll need to add type="mandatory" to absolutely everything, because we always want compose to fail if a package is missing. Michael _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
