Re: Why isn't git installed in Workstation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 08:52:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 05/19/2016 02:28 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:13:55AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >>On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 08:23 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>>Is git-core-doc a strict requirement? (If it was, I would think that
> >>>git-core
> >>>would be requiring it, not 'git'). Maybe we could make that a
> >>>Recommends: and
> >>>not include it on the install media? That certainly seems like the
> >>>largest savings.
> >>>
> >>>Of course, the obvious tradeoff is the lack of documentation...
> >>
> >>Is it required for 'git help' to work?
> >
> >Yes, git help just shows the man pages, which are in git-core-doc.
> 
> The manual pages are only a small part of git-core-doc, though:
> 
> 13276	usr/share/doc
> 984	usr/share/man
> 
> Would it make sense to split them into their own package (perhaps
> for Fedora 26)?

Or maybe just move them to git-core? Keeping man pages in the main
package is the usual solution.

Zbyszek
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux