On 05/17/2016 11:27 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:04:41AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Paul W. Frields wrote: >> >>> https://twitter.com/SparksWG3K/status/730826470147428352 >>> >>> This seems like a perfectly good question to me. Far and away the >>> preferred VCS, and it's not like it wastes a ton of disk space. >> >> I'm +1 to adding git >> >> We're currently discussing in #fedora-workstation the pro's and cons of >> including just git-core or git (which also pulls in perl). I'm ok either >> way. > > FWIW, the difference according to dnf info is git-core is about 17 MB > on disk, while git adds: > > * itself (2.2 MB on disk) > * git-core-doc (11+ MB on disk) > * 3 Perl modules (~150 KB on disk) > > Perl is already present, so there's not a huge dep stack coming in > when I install 'git' on F24 Beta, just three modules. > > The discussion in IRC seems to indicate we're not as worried about > bloat as we are about providing useful tooling out of the box. > > I'll file a pull request for comps for this since we have the votes. > Is git-core-doc a strict requirement? (If it was, I would think that git-core would be requiring it, not 'git'). Maybe we could make that a Recommends: and not include it on the install media? That certainly seems like the largest savings. Of course, the obvious tradeoff is the lack of documentation...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
