On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:27:36AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:04:41AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > > https://twitter.com/SparksWG3K/status/730826470147428352 > > > > > > This seems like a perfectly good question to me. Far and away the > > > preferred VCS, and it's not like it wastes a ton of disk space. > > > > I'm +1 to adding git > > > > We're currently discussing in #fedora-workstation the pro's and cons of > > including just git-core or git (which also pulls in perl). I'm ok either > > way. > > FWIW, the difference according to dnf info is git-core is about 17 MB > on disk, while git adds: > > * itself (2.2 MB on disk) > * git-core-doc (11+ MB on disk) > * 3 Perl modules (~150 KB on disk) > > Perl is already present, so there's not a huge dep stack coming in > when I install 'git' on F24 Beta, just three modules. > > The discussion in IRC seems to indicate we're not as worried about > bloat as we are about providing useful tooling out of the box. > > I'll file a pull request for comps for this since we have the votes. And, viola: https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/4 -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
