Re: Graphical Upgrade Test Day conflicts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi Eric,

You're the first person to try upgrading on i386, so I'm not sure why
gtk3 would need to be removed. Can you get any logs on why dnf thinks
this is required? Thanks.

Richard.

On 16 May 2016 at 19:03, Eric Griffith <egriffith92@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey guys, I'm attempting to take part in the May 16 Test Day, but I'm
> running into a slight problem with the Gnome320 copr. Fully up to date F23
> Workstation system is giving me the following conflict during upgrade.
>
> sudo dnf update gnome-software --best --allowerasing
>
> Installing:
>  f24-backgrounds-base
>                 noarch 24.1.1-1.fc23                 rhughes-f23-gnome320
> 23 M
> Upgrading:
>  gnome-software x86_64 3.20.3-0.191.20160425git.fc23 rhughes-f23-gnome320
> 3.3 M
>  json-glib      x86_64 1.2.0-1.fc23                  rhughes-f23-gnome320
> 137 k
>  libgusb        x86_64 0.2.9-1.fc23                  rhughes-f23-gnome320
> 46 k
> Removing:
>  colord-libs    i686   1.2.12-1.fc23                 @fedora
> 534 k
>  gtk3           i686   3.18.9-1.fc23                 @updates
> 17 M
>  json-glib      i686   1.0.4-2.fc23                  @fedora
> 457 k
>  libgusb        i686   0.2.8-1.fc23                  @updates
> 103 k
>  libnm-gtk      i686   1.0.10-1.fc23                 @updates
> 229 k
>
> Specifically the "Lets remove gtk3" when I don't see anything from the copr
> that would replace it.
>
> The "problem package" is libgusb-0.2.9.1 from gnome320.
>
> Thoughts on if this would be safe to do?
>
> --Eric--
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux