On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 08:33:37AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ESR will only delay the problem. > > > > Can the Fedora build add a secodary key to accept signed extensions? > > This is one of the suggested solutions, but it is not currently > implemented upstream. > > > AFAIK the long term plan is todeprecate the current method of extensions in > > favour of a more browser agnostic approach. > > Correct. Is it just me, or does it seem odd to take Mozilla to task for doing something with their (relatively much larger) ecosystem we also endeavor to do with Fedora's? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
