Re: Our sandboxed apps won't really protect users (was: Re: Darktable Copr)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I think the only way to make the sandbox meaningful is to *require* it for apps that want to use the other neat features of xdg-apps, which are easier distribution (app bundles) and stable runtimes.

People would prefer to develop against a stable runtime that will work anywhere because it's less work than developing for moving targets of many distributions which change too often. The sandbox would be a "side effect" from them, and it will protect the users from misbehaving apps and some security flaws.

AFAIK, this is already the plan.

-Elad.
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux