Re: Let's reconsider some more applications installed by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




----- Original Message -----
> On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 22:38 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:
<snip>
> > The problem is I don't think it's wise to enable SELinux by default
> > without having any UI to let the user know when a violation happens.
> > And we do want to keep SELinux enabled.
> 
> I do want to keep SELinux enabled. I don't think users need to know
> when a violation happens. That's just a bug, and I don't see any reason
> to treat SELinux bugs as more special or more horrible than other bugs.
> 
> But frankly, I don't remember the last time I've had an SELinux
> violation. totem-video-thumbnailer gets blocked from accessing the
> Internet whenever I view my web cache in nautilus, but that's a real
> bug in totem.

Reproducer welcome, this bug lacks one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135718#c1
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux