On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/20/2015 11:03 AM, drago01 wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have been working on a feature proposal for a while now to propose >>> cleaning up the wallpapers that we present to the user by default in >>> Workstation. It has been on the agenda for the last few meetings, but we >>> have run out of time in those meetings :( >>> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WallpapersCleanup >>> >>> Basically, the proposal is to clean out the wallpapers that we currently >>> present to the user, and just show: >>> >>> 1. The default fedora wallpaper for the release (the one created by the >>> Fedora Design Team) >>> 2. The default wallpaper for the upstream desktop release (e.g. the >>> default >>> GNOME wallpaper for the release of GNOME being shipped) >>> 3. A new set of 15 alternative default wallpapers chosen from the past >>> Fedora supplemental wallpapers. The supplemental wallpapers are a set of >>> wallpapers (that change every release) that are included in the repos for >>> people to install and use. The idea here would be to choose 15 of the >>> best >>> from all past supplemental wallpaper packages to be included by default. >> >> Semi related we should do something about this ever changing >> wallpapers ... hit me multiple times that after an upgrade I end up >> with a white wallpaper because the file was removed. Not that big of >> an issue but it looks bad. > > Hmmm, i have never had this issue. Usually the package that supplies release > n-1 stays around for release n for me. The upgrade shouldnt remove > previously installed packages should it? No but files. If foo-1.0.rpm ships whatever.png and foo-1.1.rpm no longer ships it ... its gone. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
