High contrast icons blocking Fedora releases - do we really want to?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi, folks. So something came up in passing at the QA meeting today which
we agreed to discuss here.

We added a criterion for Fedora 21 Final:

"All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply
with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers
policy."

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Guidelines/Applications_and_Launchers

that policy includes this:

"App launchers MUST have a unique[3] 128×128 launcher icon with an alpha
channel and a matching High Contrast icon."

so effectively any default-installed app in Workstation lacking a high
contrast icon blocks the release of Fedora. We do indeed have two such
bugs on the current blocker list:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160499
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130794

someone at the meeting wondered whether we really want to block Fedora
releases for this, and mclasen said:

<mclasen> I don't think it justifies blocking the release, tbh
<mclasen> but it is nice to have some pressure for getting those gaps
closed

We're quite strict about not using the blocker process for this kind of
thing these days, and I still think that's the best policy. One of the
problems we identified with the old blocker process back around F12-F14,
when we solidified the current process and added the "freeze
exception" (at the time, "nice to have") concept was that (ab)using the
blocker list as a list of 'priority' bugs meant no-one was really clear
on what bugs would actually literally block the release, and what bugs
would just be hand-waved when it came time to decide whether we shipped.

Since then we've stuck to the policy that only bugs we would actually
delay the release for go on the blocker list, and I think that's worked
out well and we should try to stick with it.

So with that in mind, can I ask if we really want to block Fedora
releases on high-contrast icons? If the consensus is 'yes', then fine,
no need for action. If 'no', then we'd need to amend either the release
criterion or the Applications and Launchers policy in some way - for
instance:

"App launchers MUST have a unique[3] 128×128 launcher icon with an alpha
channel and SHOULD include a matching High Contrast icon."
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux