On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:44 PM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Pretty much what we discussed on IRC yesterday. Anyone have problems
>> with me committing this today?
>>
>> josh
>>
>> diff --git a/gnome-shell.spec b/gnome-shell.spec
>> index a085076..94e284d 100644
>> --- a/gnome-shell.spec
>> +++ b/gnome-shell.spec
>> @@ -102,8 +102,6 @@ Requires: gdm-libs%{?_isa}
>> Requires: clutter%{?_isa} >= %{clutter_version}
>> # needed for settings items in menus
>> Requires: control-center
>> -# needed for captive portal support
>> -Requires: NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora
>>
>> %description
>> GNOME Shell provides core user interface functions for the GNOME 3 desktop,
>> diff --git a/fedora-release.spec b/fedora-release.spec
>> index 333875f..1d7db6b 100644
>> --- a/fedora-release.spec
>> +++ b/fedora-release.spec
>> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ Requires: fedora-release = %{version}-%{release}
>> Conflicts: fedora-release-cloud
>> Conflicts: fedora-release-server
>> Conflicts: fedora-release-standard
>> +# needed for captive portal support
>> +Requires: NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora
>>
>> %description workstation
>> Provides a base package for Fedora Workstation-specific configuration files to
>
> I don't really like that people that do upgrades get a worse
> experience because of that pointless change but well ...
There's nothing that says a user doing an upgrade wants to upgrade to
Workstation. There's also nothing that is going to magically upgrade
them to Workstation anyway. Also, they don't have this in F20 so
their experience is not worse, it's the same.
josh
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
