Did you read this? http://blogs.gnome.org/aday/2014/08/27/gnome-design-saving-you-space-since-2009-or-so/ ----- Original Message ----- > On 09/15/2014 12:41 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 11:46 -0400, Ryan Lerch wrote: > >> Would it be worth specifying both a minimum "widescreen" resolution and > >> a minimum "regular" resolution? > >> > >> Or would this just lead to more confusion? > > > > It doesn't really help. As Owen said, the limiting factor really is the > > vertical resolution. Most of the time there's no way to trade more width > > for less height. > > We could also work on fixing some of the vertical space issues, which > would help lower-resolution users as well as higher resolution users > (they would be able to see even more at one time): > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719881 > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659647 > > (I'll just keep linking to my favorite bugs in relevant conversations > until someone tells me that I'm getting annoying or I give up and switch > back to XFCE. I apologize that I'm not skilled enough to figure out how > to fix these things and post patches myself) > > -Adam Batkin > -- > desktop mailing list > desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
